As reported by F1 Flow.com last week, the FIA initiated discussions at the most recent F1 Commission meeting to examine if measures are necessary to equalize engine performance, specifically to aid Renault, the engine supplier for Alpine.
The Renault engine reportedly lags behind the leading competitors by about 30 horsepower, with no chance of bridging this gap due to the current F1 engine development halt.
The issue has subsequently been delegated to F1’s Power Unit Advisory Committee to assess the situation and recommend how to mitigate this ‘significant’ performance discrepancy.
The previous time F1’s engine equalization was discussed, the FIA proposed that the best course of action was to limit the top-performing power units to ensure equality, instead of assisting those lagging behind.
However, as the evaluation process starts, Wolff has emphatically stated that any measures that would affect everyone’s performance could ‘ruin’ the merit-based nature of F1.
Photo Credit: Steven Tee / F1 Flow Images
Wolff elaborated, “Sport is the basis for entertainment, and its credibility lies in the fact that success requires effort. If an engine supplier is struggling, and their engine is not as competitive, it becomes everyone’s problem. However, with engine development on hold, we mustn’t hinder anyone’s opportunities.”
“But it needs to be conducted in a merit-based manner. We have a provision in the 2026 power unit regulations which states that if a power unit’s performance falls 3% below the top unit, the teams should come together in good faith to discuss possible solutions.”
“We need to reach a consensus about the performance deficiency, then consider additional dyno hours and development concessions. This will be a topic for our discussions.”
“However, any manipulation of fuel flow or Balance of Performance is a recipe for disaster and tantamount to an insolvency declaration for F1. It should never even be a topic of discussion.”
Also read:
Why Aston and McLaren are testing F1 Pirellis that may never race
McLaren pushing to sign off final F1 ‘conceptual evolution’ update for 2023 car
10 things we learned from the 2023 F1 Belgian Grand Prix
Alpine candidly admits it is trailing its competitors in terms of power, and this push for equalization is crucial due to the restrictions imposed by the cost cap.
Alpine’s temporary team principal, Bruno Famin, commented at Spa: “It’s undeniable that the engine is slightly underpowered. We are in an engine development freeze, which means we cannot improve performance.”
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about F1 Engine Balancing
What was discussed at the recent F1 Commission meeting regarding engine performance?
The FIA initiated discussions at the F1 Commission meeting to examine if measures are necessary to equalize engine performance, particularly to assist Renault, the engine supplier for Alpine. This comes as the Renault engine reportedly lags behind the leading competitors by about 30 horsepower.
What does Wolff think about F1’s potential engine balancing?
Wolff has expressed concern about any actions that could impact everyone’s performance in F1. He believes such measures could ‘ruin’ the merit-based nature of the sport and hence has cautioned against any such potential engine balancing leading to Balance of Performance.
What is the current situation of Alpine’s engine performance?
Alpine acknowledges that its engine, supplied by Renault, is behind rivals in terms of power. The equalization push is significant for them due to the restrictions imposed by the cost cap. With the engine development freeze in place, the team cannot currently improve performance.
What is F1’s Power Unit Advisory Committee’s role in this situation?
The issue of Renault’s engine performance lag has been delegated to F1’s Power Unit Advisory Committee. This committee is expected to assess the situation and recommend how to mitigate this ‘significant’ performance discrepancy.
What did Wolff suggest for handling engine performance discrepancies?
Wolff suggested that if a power unit’s performance falls 3% below the top unit, the teams should come together in good faith to discuss possible solutions. This includes additional dyno hours and development concessions. However, he strongly opposed any manipulation of fuel flow or Balance of Performance, calling it a recipe for disaster.
5 comments
not a fan of this engine freeze.. robs the teams of the opportunity to improve and adapt.
Is it just me or is the FIA way too eager to interfere? They’re messing with the sport’s competitive spirit. Let the teams innovate and race!
wolf is right, meritocracy is what keeps f1 great. U can’t just dumb down the best to make everyone equal.
ouch! if F1 goes for BOP, it’s going to be a huge blow to the sport’s prestige. Hope the FIA knows what they’re doing…
Tough luck for Alpine though…30 HP down? That’s gotta sting!