In a significant move to enforce compliance with cost cap regulations, the International Automobile Federation (FIA) has acted to prevent F1 teams from leveraging specialized project divisions outside their core teams to enhance performance gains, a practice suspected by some insiders.
Historically, F1 teams have assigned experienced technical staff to distinct divisions for technological projects, exploiting insights from grand prix racing and commercializing it in broader business contexts. Notable examples include Red Bull’s Advanced Technology division, McLaren’s Applied Technologies, Mercedes’ Applied Science, and Aston Martin’s Performance Technologies.
These divisions have successfully executed several projects, ranging from road cars to America’s Cup yachts, bicycles, and other innovative designs. However, the FIA intervened amid concerns that some teams might be manipulating the system to acquire F1 knowledge from these divisions outside the cost cap and then feed it back to their teams at no charge.
In response, the FIA has issued a revised technical directive, initially drafted earlier this year, now implemented to restrict any transfer of Intellectual Property (IP) from external projects back into the F1 operations without being considered part of the cost cap.
Known as TD45, the directive stipulates that while teams can still operate these specialized project divisions, any IP leveraged by F1 teams must be included under the cost cap, eliminating the chance of utilizing free resources within the same company.
F1 teams can still freely share knowledge with the technical divisions, maintaining its value for external business interests.
Despite the absence of an official statement from the FIA, several teams with such technical divisions, when contacted by F1 Flow.com, maintained that they have abided by the rules and appreciate the clarification.
According to a prominent F1 source familiar with the situation, TD45 has already prompted changes. The source mentioned that the directive had forced some teams to modify their operations, as they realized their previous practices were no longer permissible.
Concerns about teams taking advantage of F1 staff assigned to external operations have been rife since the introduction of the cost cap.
Earlier this year, Alpine team principal Otmar Szafnauer suggested that larger teams had discovered loopholes to staff their operations without affecting the cost cap.
TD45 arrives amidst a concerted effort by the FIA to intensify their investigation into team spending this year as part of its cost cap analysis. Recent reports indicate the FIA has been conducting in-depth financial audits at team factories, with the compliance questionnaire now exceeding 100 questions, significantly more than the previous year.
In 2022, Red Bull faced a $7 million fine and a cut in windtunnel development time for overspending during the year.
Mercedes: Major changes for 2024 F1 car won’t be obstructed by cost cap
The unspoken cost cap rules impeding Williams’ F1 progress
Red Bull cautions against salary “race to the bottom” under F1 cost cap
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about FIA Cost Cap Regulations
What is the recent action taken by the FIA regarding the cost cap in Formula 1?
The International Automobile Federation (FIA) has revised and implemented a technical directive (TD45) to prevent F1 teams from exploiting specialized project divisions outside their core teams to gain performance advantages.
What are these ‘specialized project divisions’ mentioned in relation to F1 teams?
These specialized project divisions are separate divisions within the larger F1 team structure, where senior technical staff work on technical projects. These projects often involve exploiting insights gained from grand prix racing and commercializing them in broader business contexts. Examples include Red Bull’s Advanced Technology division and McLaren’s Applied Technologies.
What restrictions does the new technical directive TD45 impose on F1 teams?
The TD45 directive stipulates that while teams can still operate these specialized project divisions, any intellectual property (IP) derived from them and utilized by the F1 teams must be accounted for under the cost cap. This prevents teams from using free resources within the same company for their F1 operations.
What has been the response from F1 teams to this new directive?
Several teams with such technical divisions insist that they have fully complied with the rules and welcome the clarification brought by the TD45 directive. Some teams have reportedly already begun making changes in response to the new regulations.
What has been the impact of the cost cap in the past?
The cost cap has significantly influenced team spending. In 2022, for instance, Red Bull was fined $7 million and had a reduction in windtunnel development time for overspending during that year. The cost cap has been a topic of constant discussion and scrutiny in the F1 community.