Ferrari is set to engage in confidential discussions concerning compensation for the significant damage to Carlos Sainz’s SF-23, which occurred during a recent F1 event. Sainz encountered a detached metal water valve cover on the track, resulting in extensive destruction to various parts of the vehicle, including the chassis, power unit, and energy store.
This situation is reminiscent of the 2017 Malaysian Grand Prix, where Romain Grosjean’s Haas suffered substantial damage due to a dislodged drain cover. Haas later successfully negotiated a financial settlement with the event organizers in Sepang.
When queried about pursuing similar compensation for the incident in Las Vegas, Ferrari’s principal, Vasseur, mentioned he would engage in private talks with the involved parties. These discussions are likely to involve Liberty Media and F1, given that the race is managed internally rather than by a local organization.
Vasseur emphasized the financial strain this incident places on Ferrari, particularly concerning the budget cap. The team now faces additional expenses, including transporting a spare chassis from Italy to Abu Dhabi for the upcoming race. The crash not only led to significant material damage — including the engine, gearbox, and battery — but also impacts Ferrari’s budget and spare parts stock.
Moreover, Vasseur intends to bring up the topic of excluding such uncontrollable damages from the budget cap in future discussions. He expressed concern over the time taken to escalate from a yellow to a red flag during the incident. He argued that the delay indicated a recognition of track hazards but a slow response to adequately safeguard the drivers.
In addition, Esteban Ocon also experienced chassis damage after the red flag was issued while heading back to the pits. Vasseur confirmed that there was no communication from race control about debris on the track, leaving teams unaware of the specific cause for the caution flags.
In other F1 news, fans at the Las Vegas Grand Prix reportedly dismantled screens blocking their view, while Leclerc’s potential victory was thwarted by a mid-race safety car. Verstappen also commented on his penalty for an on-track incident with Leclerc, deeming it a “probably right call.”
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Ferrari F1 Compensation
What incident occurred with Carlos Sainz’s Ferrari SF-23 during the F1 event?
Carlos Sainz’s Ferrari SF-23 was severely damaged after running over a detached metal water valve cover on the track. This incident caused extensive harm to the car’s chassis, power unit, and energy store.
Is there a precedent for Ferrari seeking compensation for the damage to Sainz’s car?
Yes, a similar incident happened at the 2017 Malaysian GP, where Romain Grosjean’s Haas was damaged due to a loose drain cover. Haas successfully negotiated financial compensation with the Sepang organizers, setting a precedent.
Who will Ferrari discuss compensation with for the damage in Las Vegas?
Ferrari’s principal, Vasseur, plans to have private discussions with the stakeholders, likely involving Liberty Media and F1, as the race is promoted in-house rather than by a local entity.
How has the incident affected Ferrari’s budget and preparation for upcoming races?
The damage to Sainz’s car has put a strain on Ferrari’s budget, especially under the F1 budget cap. Ferrari faces extra costs, including flying a spare chassis from Italy to Abu Dhabi and dealing with damages to various car components.
What concerns did Vasseur raise about the safety flag response during the incident?
Vasseur expressed concern about the delay in escalating from a yellow flag to a red flag during the incident, indicating a slow response to track hazards that could have safeguarded the drivers more effectively.
More about Ferrari F1 Compensation
- Ferrari SF-23 Damage Details
- Precedent of F1 Compensation Cases
- Ferrari’s Budget Cap Challenges
- Safety Regulations in F1 Racing
- Las Vegas GP Incident Analysis
5 comments
Grosjean’s incident in ’17 sets a pretty clear precedent, doesn’t it? I mean, if Haas got compensated, Ferrari should too. Only fair, right?
man, Ferrari’s really got their work cut out for them, fixing up after that mess in vegas. That valve cover did a number on Sainz’s car, huh? Talk about bad luck
Vasseur’s right about the flag response. A full minute before red flagging? That’s just too slow. Safety should be priority, especially at those speeds.
Keeping under the budget cap’s tough enough without accidents like this. Vasseur’s got a point about those extra costs. They’re gonna feel that hit for sure.
No heads up about the debris? That’s a big oversight by race control. Could’ve been worse, glad it wasn’t.